GS Spark: Journal of Applied Academic Discourse

GS Spark: Journal of Applied Academic Discourse, Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2025, 1-6, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17289345

Online publication date: Jun 20, 2025

Publication date: Jun 30, 2025

Views: 4 | Downloads: 1

Scientific writing serves as the basis of academic communication and knowledge dissemination in research communities worldwide. This editorial examines the essential components that constitute effective scientific writing, addressing both structural and qualitative elements necessary for successful scholarly communication. The discussion encompasses fundamental aspects, including proper manuscript structure, adherence to formatting guidelines, ethical considerations, and the critical role of clarity in scientific expression. Drawing on established research methodologies and publication standards, this editorial guides researchers at all career stages who seek to enhance their scientific writing capabilities. Key areas explored include the importance of comprehensive literature reviews, methodological transparency, appropriate use of citations, and the ethical obligations inherent in scholarly publishing. The editorial emphasizes that effective scientific writing extends beyond merely documenting research findings to encompass clear communication of methodologies, implications, and limitations. Furthermore, it highlights the transformative potential of well-constructed scientific narratives in advancing interdisciplinary collaboration and fostering innovation across STEAM disciplines. The recommendations presented herein aim to support the development of writing practices that meet publication standards while also making significant contributions to the broader scientific discourse and advancing knowledge. Finally, this editorial concludes with a brief overview of the articles featured in Volume 3, Issue 1.

scientific writing academic communication knowledge dissemination formatting guidelines ethical considerations

1. American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). American Psychological Association.
2. Andrade, C. (2011). How to write a good abstract for a scientific paper or conference presentation. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 53(2), 172–175. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5545.82558
3. Artino, A. R., Driessen, E., & Maggio, L. A. (2019). Ethical shades of gray: International frequency of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices in health professions education. Academic Medicine, 94(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002412
4. Bavdekar, S. B. (2016). Formulating the right title for a research article. Journal of Association of Physicians of India, 64(2), 53–56.
5. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. SAGE Publications.
6. Bornmann, L. (2011). Scientific peer review. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 45(1), 197–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2011.1440450112
7. Brownell, S. E., Price, J. V., & Steinman, L. (2013). Science communication to the general public: Why we need to teach undergraduate and graduate students this skill as part of their formal scientific training. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 12(1), E6–E10.
8. Casadevall, A., & Fang, F. C. (2018). Reproducible science. Infection and Immunity, 78(12), 4972–4975. https://doi.org/10.1128/IAI.00908-10
9. Clark, R. P. (2016). Writing tools: 55 essential strategies for every writer. Little, Brown and Company.
10. Committee on Publication Ethics. (2019). Guidelines on good publication practice. COPE.
11. Crews, F. (2013). The random house handbook (6th ed.). Random House.
12. Dahal, N. (2025). Qualitative data analysis: Reflections, procedures, and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 10, 1669578. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1669578
13. Day, R. A., & Gastel, B. (2016). How to write and publish a scientific paper (8th ed.). Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400666926
14. Docherty, M., & Smith, R. (1999). The case for structuring the discussion of scientific papers. BMJ, 318(7193), 1224–1225. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1224
15. Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587862
16. Gastel, B., & Day, R. A. (2016). How to write and publish a scientific paper (8th ed.). Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400666926
17. Goldbort, R. (2006). Writing for science. Yale University Press.
18. Gopen, G. D., & Swan, J. A. (1990). The science of scientific writing. American Scientist, 78(6), 550–558.
19. Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203927984
20. Heard, S. B. (2016). The scientist's guide to writing: How to write more easily and effectively throughout your scientific career. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400881147
21. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. (2019). Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. ICMJE.
22. Ioannidis, J. P. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
23. Kallet, R. H. (2004). How to write the methods section of a research paper. Respiratory Care, 49(10), 1229–1232.
24. Lanham, R. A. (2007). Revising prose (5th ed.). Longman.
25. Nosek, B. A., Alter, G., Banks, G. C., Borsboom, D., Bowman, S. D., Breckler, S. J., ... & Yarkoni, T. (2015). Promoting an open research culture. Science, 348(6242), 1422–1425. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374
26. Pears, R., & Shields, G. (2019). Cite them right: The essential referencing guide (11th ed.). Red Globe Press.
27. Pinker, S. (2014). The sense of style: The thinking person's guide to writing in the 21st century. Viking.
28. Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. Office of Research Integrity.
29. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632
30. Smith, R. (2006). Peer review: A flawed process at the heart of science and journals. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(4), 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/014107680609900414
31. Sollaci, L. B., & Pereira, M. G. (2004). The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (IMRAD) structure: A fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 92(3), 364–367.
32. Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022268
33. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. B. (2012). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills (3rd ed.). University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2173936
34. Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674065093
35. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd ed.). Graphics Press.
36. Williams, J. M., & Bizup, J. (2017). Style: Lessons in clarity and grace (12th ed.). Pearson.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.