GS Spark: Journal of Applied Academic Discourse

GS Spark: Journal of Applied Academic Discourse, Volume 3, Issue 1, June 2025, 70-81, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18144273

Publication date: Jun 30, 2025

Views: 666 | Downloads: 70

It is often emphasized in discourse that Nepal’s federal system mandates participatory local planning to promote inclusive governance; however, implementation of the provisions remains limited. This study explores how participatory planning is practiced in Nepal’s local governments by analyzing legal provisions, their implementation status, and factors affecting practice. Employing qualitative methods—document analysis and literature review—the research identifies significant gaps between policy and practice. Findings reveal that although the legal framework supports inclusive planning, implementation is constrained by weak institutional capacity, limited stakeholder engagement, and entrenched power dynamics. Marginalized communities frequently lack confidence and opportunities to engage meaningfully in planning and budgeting. To address these challenges, the study recommends strengthening capacity-building initiatives for communities, institutionalizing transparent and accountable planning processes, and establishing accountability mechanisms that foster genuine participation. These measures are crucial for Nepal’s federal local governments to realize constitutional mandates for social inclusion and equitable development.

local government planning provisions participatory practice annual plan federalism

1. Abullaish. (1980). An evaluation of administrative decentralization in Nepal. Kathmandu: Centre for Economic Development and Administration, Tribhuvan University.
2. Acharya, G. D. (2018). Including the excluded: Marginalised poor communities and development practices in rural Nepal [Doctoral thesis, The University of Queensland]. UQ eSpace. https://doi.org/10.14264/uql.2018.612
3. Acharya, K. K., Dhungana, R. K., & Guragain, H. P. (2022). The position of marginalized groups in the elite captured local level planning process in Nepal. Nepal Public Policy Review, 1(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3126/nppr.v2i1.48394
4. Acharya, K. K., & Zafarullah, H. (2022). Whither demarginalization, inclusion and effectiveness? Challenges of local government planning in Nepal. Millennial Asia. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996221107116.
5. Adhikari, G. (2025). Inclusion and Exclusion: Dalit and Marginalized Participation in Local Government Planning in Nepal. Historical Journal, 16(1), 23–38.https://doi.org/10.3126/hj.v16i1.76357.
6. Adhikari, G. (2024). Breaking the Unbreakable Glass Wall: Practice of Local Government Planning and Marginalized People of Nepal (Unpublished Master of Philosophy dissertation).
7. Bhusal, T. (2019). Do informal forums matter? Lessons from Nepal’s local policymaking. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 1(4), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516602619896187 https://researchsystem.canberra.edu.au/ws/portalfiles/portal/45175306/Final_Version_of_Thanesh_s_Thesis.pdf
8. Bhusal, T. (2023). Participatory local governance in rural Nepal: The primacy of informality. Development Policy Review, 41(6), e12724. https://doi.org/10.1111/dpr.12724
9. Bhusal, T., & Acharya, K. K. (2024). Five years of local democracy in federal Nepal (2017– 2022). Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies. https://doi.org/10.1002/app5.389
10. Government of Nepal. (2017). Local Government Operation Act, 2074 (2017). Retrieved from https://lawcommission.gov.np/np/documents/%e0%a4%b8%e0%a5%8d%e0%a4%a5
11. Government of Nepal. (2017). Intergovernmental Fiscal Management Act, 2074 (2017). Retrieved from https://lawcommission.gov.np/np/documents/%e0%a4%85%e0%a4%a8%e0%a5%8d
12. Hachhethu, K. (2008). Local democracy and political parties in Nepal: A case study of Dhanusha District. In D. N. Gellner & K. Hachhethu (Eds.), Local democracy in South Asia: Microprocesses of democratization in Nepal and its neighbours (pp. 63–88). SAGE Publications.
13. Khanal, G. (2016). Fiscal decentralization and municipal performance in Nepal. Journal of Management and Development Studies, 27, 59–87.
14. Lamichhane, R., & Paswan, B. (2023). Palikako Niti ra Budget Ma Dalit (Madhesh Pradesh): FY 2077/78, 2078/79 & 2079/80. Dalit Sarokar Manch Saptari.
15. Lohani, P. (1980). People’s participation in development (1st ed.). Centre for Economic Development and Administration, Tribhuvan University.
16. Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration. (2017). Local Level Annual Plan and Budget Formation Guideline, 2074 (Revised). Retrieved from https://mofaga.gov.np/model-law/145
17. Ministry of Federal Affairs and General Administration. (2020). Annual Plan and Budget Formulation Handbook of Local Level, 2077. Retrieved from https://www.mofaga.gov.np/news-notice/2122
18. Nepal Administrative Staff College [NASC]. (2022). Local governance, gender responsive and socially inclusive public finance management: Knowledge, attitudes, and practices. Lalitpur: Nepal Administrative Staff College.
19. National Planning Commission. (2021). Guideline for Local Level Plan Formulation, 2078. Retrieved from https://npc.gov.np/images/category/220106044450Guideline%20for%20LP%20Planning.pdf
20. Nepal G. (2008). Development and planning in the era of globalization. Himalaya Books Stall.
21. Pant, Y. P. (1996). Budgets in Nepal. Retrieved from https://www.epw.in/system/files/pdf/1956_8/16/budgets_in_nepal.pdf
22. Sapkota, B. D., & Malakar, I. M. (2021). Local development planning process: A policy-level analysis in Nepal. Journal of Population and Development. Retrieved from https://researchgate.net/
23. Tandon, V. K. (2023). Participation and deliberation at the local level in the federal context of Nepal (Unpublished doctoral dissertation)
24. Wildavsky, A. (1972). Why planning fails in Nepal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(4), 508-528.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.